Obstruction of Justice in Florida
Paternity fraud is "a recipe for violence"
January 15, 2003
by Jim Untershine
Michael Anderson is being forced to "mentor a child" in Florida by
paying $666 per month for 18 years.\1 Although
the child has no legal right to the damages awarded by the court, Mr.
Anderson is forced to pay $225 per month more than taxpayers if this 2
person family received welfare (TANF). \2 If
Mr. Anderson resists this form of indentured servitude, by refusing to
pay into fraud, he may face debtor's prison.
As a member of local law enforcement in Tampa, Florida, Mr. Anderson
was served up a heaping helping of family law justice and warns that the
current law is "a recipe for violence." \1After
Mr. Anderson obtained DNA proof that he was a victim of a confidence game,
the Florida Supreme Court decided that this irrefutable evidence did not
prove that Mr. Anderson was deceived. As if to say "she never said that
this baby was yours, she said she couldn't believe it wasn't".
When the only person in a position to know the truth is not required
to tell it, then judges are powerless to administer justice and
the lawyers are powerless to seek it. Allowing a litigant to operate
with impunity and granting them immunity from prosecution, results
in a child who is denied to know the identity of its biological father,
a man who is fraudulently sentenced to indentured servitude, and a possible
source of federal incentives earned by the state's CSE for collecting
the fraudulent child support payments.
The Family Law ramifications for "doing the right thing" may not be
as bad as some states might think.
Mother files for TANF benefits ($442 per month in Florida \2),
TANF receives 70% ($309 per month in Florida ) from the federal
government and registers an out-of-wedlock birth \3
CSE files default court orders assigning paternity to Usama Bin Laudin
(without prejudice to either party).
CSE attaches a percentage of Usama's net income (18% in Florida
\4), unless Usama shows up to contest
it
CSE calculates 10% interest that has accrued since child birth using
the income of Usama
CSE applies this ever-growing arrearage to Usama's bank accounts,
refunds and wages,.denies his passports and licenses, tracks his
whereabouts, and issues a warrant for his arrest.
How can we demand that Mr. Anderson continue to work for a Florida
Attorney General who has turned his back on his troops. How can
we expect Mr. Anderson to enforce laws uniformly when his boss is not
required to do the same. Fraud is a crime and some may agree that "crime
don't pay, people do".
The stronger your resolve to defend the walls of your mighty kingdom,
the more unbearable the anguish to later find out that it was in reality
your prison.
The common denominator regarding paternity fraud is establishing paternity
at childbirth.
The common denominator regarding welfare reform is reducing the number
of unwed mothers who cannot financially support their children.
The common denominator regarding violence in our schools and communities
is giving our children an authority figure other than law enforcement.
The common denominator regarding anything involving church or state
is, and forever shall be, our children.
\2 Table 7-9 -
"Maximum Combined TANF And Food Stamp Benefit For Families Of One
To Six Persons, January 1, 2000" US House Ways and Means Committee,
Greenbook, Section 7, TANF
Florida reports $293 per month TANF benefits
for a 1 person family, $442 for 2, $587 for 3, $721 for 4
California reports $384 per month TANF benefits
for a 1 person family, $627 for 2, $813 for 3, $988 for 4.
\3 Table 8-20 "Paternities
Established", Table 8-21 "Out-Of-Wedlock Births", Table 8-22 "Percentage
of Paternities Established". US House Ways and Means Committee, Greenbook,
Section 8, CSE. Florida's paternity establishment
percentage was reported to be 68% in 1998 and represents over 23,000
out-of-wedlock births over and above paternity establishments. California's
paternity establishment percentage was reported to be 123% in 1998
and represents over 34,000 paternity establishments over and above
out-of-wedlock births. California has continued to exceed 100% paternity
establishment since Clinton's welfare reform made it profitable in
1996
\4 AllLaw.com
Florida demands 18% of an NCP's net income
for 1 child, 28% for 2, 36% for 3.
California demands 25% of an NCP's net income for
1 child, 40% for 2, 50% for 3
Jim Untershine holds a BSEE from Mississippi State
University and has 13 years experience in feedback control system
design. Mr. Untershine is currently using the Heisenberg Uncertainty
Principle and the teachings of Henry David Thoreau (civil disobedience)
to expose Family Law in California as the exploitation of children
for money and the indentured servitude of heterosexual taxpayers who
dare to raise children in this country.
Visit his website here.
