Sociological Warfare
New legislation that seeks to reform welfare is designed to reform
humanity
January 7, 2003
The new legislation contained in HB 4090 \1 has triggered the first phase of a sinister plan to wreak havoc on our civilization.
Phase One will seek to actively encourage custodial parents (CP) to find another potential noncustodial parent (NCP) for their State's family law money machine.\2 This allows Child Support Enforcement (CSE) to spread like a virus using the CP as the carrier of this contagious disease.
"Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson announced Thursday more than $2.2 million in grants to 12 states and a variety of religious, nonprofit and tribal organizations to advance the nation's child support enforcement system." \3
"The goal is to "increase child support collections, promote fatherhood and healthy marriage, and help struggling families take care of their children," Thompson said. " \3
"Bush, bypassing a reluctant Congress, signed executive orders last month that put parts of his faith-based initiative in motion. His steps help give religious organizations more of a chance to win federal contracts for a variety of social services." \3
Phase Two will seek to actively encourage employers to hire CPs, give them raises, and promotions.\4 This allows CSE to receive new customers when financially insolvent NCPs are fired by their employers to allow more CPs to be hired..
Phase Three will seek to actively encourage States to ignore certain parts of the federal mandate that may hinder the operation of their money machine. \5 This allows CSE to ignore federal protections granted to NCPs regarding employer discrimination due to child support garnishments in their implementation of strange demonstration projects.
It is feared that California will feel the first devastating effects of this positive feedback to an already inherently unstable Family Law system. NCPs exposed to this unstable family law system may become unstable themselves when they realize they were the victims of a state-operated confidence game.
Legislators must be made aware that this family law microphone is already too close to the speaker. Politicians have failed to consider the human costs in their state's exploitation of children for money. The age of accountability will soon catch up with states that have allowed greed to turn welfare reform into genocide.
Legislators must be made aware that the federal law (USC 42 666 b6Di) that protects NCPs from employers who fire or refuse to hire due to the existence of child support garnishments are not being enforced by some states. For example, California Family Code 5290 sets a maximum civil penalty of $500 to be imposed on an employer \10 (if the impoverished NCP can afford to win a civil suit against the offending employer), while this form of discrimination is not recognized by the court as a lawful excuse in a criminal nonsupport charge. \11
Legislators must be made aware that the interstate child support guidelines reported to the federal government reflect the TANF benefits allowed by each state and not the child support amount that is demanded to be paid by the NCP. \12
Legislators must be made aware that child support consultation firms are actively subverting the federal laws by ignoring the non-implementation of federal protections granted to NCPs in the review of the state's child support guideline. Policy Studies Inc. (PSI) provides child support consultation to 49 states, Canada, Australia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. \13
"Have you ever stood and stared at it and marveled at it's beauty, it's genius? Millions of families just living out their lives, oblivious. You know the first family law system was designed to be a perfect world where no one suffered and everyone was happy. It was a disaster, no one fell behind in child support, federal funding was lost. Some believed we lacked the understanding to describe your perfect world, but we believe that as a species, human beings define their reality through misery and suffering. The perfect world was a dream that your primitive cerebrum refused to wake up from. Which is why family law was redesigned to this. We wreak havoc on your civilization. I say your civilization, but when we started thinking for you it really became our civilization. Which, of course, is what this is all about. Evolution. Like the dinosaur, you had your time. The future is our world. The future is our time." \14
\1 107th Congress, 2D Session, H. R. 4090, To reauthorize and improve the program of block grants to States for temporary assistance for needy families, and for other purposes, In The House Of Representatives, April 9, 2002, http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_bills&docid=f:h4090ih.txt.pdf . Modifications to HR 4090 as Introduced, or http://www.geocities.com/gndzerosrv/hr4090_all.htm.
\2 USC 42 603 (a)(2) Healthy Marriage Promotion Grants - (A) Authority - The Secretary shall award competitive grants to States, territories, and tribal organizations for not more than 50 percent of the cost of developing and implementing innovative programs to promote and support healthy, married, 2-parent families.
\3 Gov't Awards Marriage Promotion Grants, Siobhan McDonough, Associated Press Writer, 01-03-03.
\4 USC 42 603 (a)(4)(C) FORMULA FOR MEASURING STATE PERFORMANCE - (i) IN GENERAL.—Subject to clause (ii), not later than October 1, 2003, the Secretary, in consultation with the National Governors Association and the American Public Human Services Association shall develop a formula for measuring State performance in operating the State program funded under this part so as to achieve the goals of employment entry, job retention, and increased earnings from employment for families receiving assistance under the program, as measured on an absolute basis and on the basis of improvement in State performance.
\5 42 U.S.C. 1320a–9 (j) Streamlined Process For Consideration Of Amendments And Extensions.—The Secretary shall develop a streamlined process for consideration of amendments and extensions proposed by States to demonstration projects conducted under this section.
\6 CAFC 4055 25% of NCP net income for 1 child, 40% for 2, 50% for 3, ..., regardless of CP income (NCP earns between $1,000 - $8,000 per month, 0% custody).
\7 USC 42 666 (b)(6)(D) - Provision must be made for the imposition of a fine against any employer who - (i) discharges from employment, refuses to employ, or takes disciplinary action against any noncustodial parent subject to income withholding required by this subsection because of the existence of such withholding and the obligations or additional obligations which it imposes upon the employer; or (ii) fails to withhold support from income or to pay such amounts to the State disbursement unit in accordance with this subsection.
\8 2001 - 2002 California DCSS Local Assistance Administrative Costs and Collections Estimates, http://www.childsup.ca.gov/pub/budget/2002/2002-05budget.pdf, http://www.childsup.ca.gov/pub/reports/2002/2002-11annual.pdf. CA Program Costs - Table 1 - California Child Support Program Costs totaled $1.00 billion = $615 million Federal (61%) + $394 million State (39%) + $44,000 Reimbursement (0.004%). CA Program Collections - Table 1 - California Assistance Collection (TANF) Revenue totaled $713 million = $341 million Federal (48%) + $334 million State (47%) + $39 million County (6%).
\9 CA Dept. of Justice - Homicide in California, 2000, http://caag.state.ca.us/cjsc/publications/homicide/homi2000/cr1.pdf, Chart 15 - Gender of Victim by Relationship of Victim to Offender, and Chart 17 - Age of Victim by Relationship of Victim to Offender
\10 CAFC 5290. No employer shall use an assignment order authorized by this chapter as grounds for refusing to hire a person or for discharging or taking disciplinary action against an employee. An employer who engages in the conduct prohibited by this section may be assessed a civil penalty of a maximum of five hundred dollars ($500).
\11 CAPC 270. Criminal Nonsupport - If a parent of a minor child willfully omits, without lawful excuse, to furnish necessary clothing, food, shelter or medical attendance, or other remedial care for his or her child, he or she is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
\12 US House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means, GREENBOOK, Section 8, CSE, Table 8-2 - Interstate child support guidelines reported by Pirog, Klotz, and Buyers from the Institute of Family and Social Responsibility (FASR), http://www.spea.indiana.edu/fasr
\13 California Judicial Council Guideline Review reported by Policy Studies Inc. (PSI), http://www.policy-studies.com/about/about_intro.htm
\14 The Hollywood Family Law knockoff entitled "THE MATRIX". See "Prophecy, History, and Hollywood", http://www.geocities.com/gndzerosrv/proph_hist_holly.htm.
On the Net:
Gov't Awards Marriage Promotion Grants
Health and Human Services Department: http://www.hhs.gov
Americans United for Separation of Church and State: http://www.au.org/
