| MND COMMENTARY |
|
Will She Call 911 on You? by Marc H. Rudov Introduction There is a dirty, little secret in America—never covered by mainstream newspapers, magazines, or TV and radio networks: Using the sanction and anti-male, unconstitutional force of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA)—originally enacted in 1994—vindictive women, in increasing numbers, make fraudulent 911 calls to scare and punish their boyfriends and husbands. If a woman calls 911, claiming fear of a man, the police automatically will: 1) arrive on the scene, 2) believe the woman’s version of events, and 3) arrest the accused man. That’s OK if the man is guilty of domestic violence (DV). Alas, it also happens when a woman invents violence, premeditates malice, and manipulates a Napoleonic law-enforcement system that, in overreaction to the OJ Simpson case, condones DV fraud against men. American courts and police forces routinely oblige VAWA’s basic premise: Women are innocent victims; men are guilty predators—even though women are equally guilty of committing DV crimes. But, any good street cop knows that arresting a woman for DV will jeopardize his career. Instead, for arresting men, he is rewarded and his department receives increased VAWA funding from the US Department of Justice’s Office on Violence Against Women. Congress—led by Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE), the “father of VAWA”—recently reauthorized VAWA of 2005, driving a larger wedge between men’s and women’s civil rights, and flouting the Constitution’s 14th Amendment. Joining Biden’s charge to vilify men were Senators Specter (R-PA), Leahy (D-VT), and Hatch (R-UT)—the chief US Senate proponents of VAWA 2005. Thanks, guys. The resulting fallout is that girls are now learning in school that boys and men are predators, and that calling 911 is the easiest way to punish them. These girls don’t learn any situation-assessment or negotiating skills; all they learn is: “woman good, man bad, call 911.” They don’t learn about the damage a mistaken, wrongful, or fraudulent 911 phonecall can do to a man’s life. Why? Because it’s only a man’s life; he’s disposable. By the time these girls become women, the “911 reflex” is ingrained in them. Victimhood lives! A Chilling Vignette Below is a chilling hypothetical vignette that I created and verified with several highly regarded defense attorneys. It is an accurate harbinger of what can happen to you, if you let a vindictive woman into your life—especially, into your home. If this drama doesn’t get your attention, nothing will: Steven is the founder and CEO of a top advertising agency. He lives in a striking chalet on a beautiful beachfront property, for which he sacrificed and worked hard over the years to purchase. For the past year, Steven has been dating Jessica, a successful model. Despite some reservations about her bouts of jealousy and her frequent pressure on him to marry her, he decided to invite her to move in with him. Jessica accepted. After a month of romantic bliss and relative calm, Jessica’s jealous streak resurfaced. Steven has many female friends and colleagues, and Jessica, notwithstanding her amazing beauty, viewed every one of these women as a potential threat. No matter how many times Steven reassured her, Jessica didn’t curtail her distrustful behavior. To compound the anxiety, she talked incessantly about marriage. Steven became fed up: he couldn’t even think about marriage with a woman so insecure and distrustful. Steven ultimately realized that rooming with Jessica had been a mistake. So, he told her that their acrimony was affecting his work life and mental health, and asked her to move out. Jessica didn’t like Steven’s change of heart one bit. She was hell-bent on marrying him, living in his house, ending her stressful modeling career, and availing herself of his wealth and lifestyle amenities. Steven, on the other hand, was adamant in his decision to become a bachelor once again. A heated verbal exchange ensued, during which Jessica began screaming, crying, and—per the VAWA playbook—yelling “abuse” at a level deliberately high enough for the neighbors to hear. In an immature rage, Jessica locked herself in the bedroom to call 911. She told the 911 dispatcher that Steven had threatened her and shoved her against the wall. The police arrived on the scene within minutes. After some perfunctory questioning, the police cuffed and arrested Steven and took him to jail. He contacted his lawyer, arranged bail, and was released pending an arraignment and probable trial. When Steven emerged from jail, he fully expected to return home and find Jessica gone. Wrong! From a judge in family court, Jessica had secured a restraining order against Steven, who was not allowed back into his own house. Furthermore, the judge gave Jessica the right to live alone in Steven’s house for 60 days while she looked for new housing. At the arraignment, the DA charged Steven with a battery misdemeanor. Now, unless Jessica’s wobbly recantation convinces the DA to drop the charges—an unlikely outcome—Steven faces a jury trial. He can’t believe how a vindictive woman, with the help of the anti-male, VAWA-dominated court and police force, was able to destroy his life so easily and quickly—with a single, fraudulent 911 call. His version of the incident mattered not, as if his rights existed not. After a few days, Steven’s lawyer got him permission to send a friend to his house to retrieve his car, computer, and some personal effects. But, while Jessica sleeps in his comfortable bed, Steven has to incur the expenses of sleeping in a hotel and eating in restaurants, and is proscribed from accessing his private files and other possessions located throughout his house. Jessica, on the other hand, has free reign of his home, pool, food, liquor, and tennis club. You go, girl. Epilogue: In this saga, Steven lost his civil rights, good name, clean record, focus on his company, and a wad of money into his lawyer’s wallet—all after only one month of cohabitation, in his own house, with a malicious woman. Had Jessica lived with him longer, she would have had even-more power to destroy him! Don’t Play with Matches If you think Steven’s experience is unique, one that couldn’t happen to you, you are gravely mistaken. Think of our VAWA-controlled country as a basement with a gas leak. The wrong woman is like a lit match. Take a lit match into that gas-filled room, and what do you get? A massive explosion with unforeseen and irreversible damages. That is why choosing the right woman is paramount—not just for peace in the house but also for your safety. The majority of women are nice, thoughtful, reasonable people who understand that couples break up and go their separate ways. That’s life. But, not all women are nice and thoughtful and reasonable. Worse, these dangerous women, like all women, have more civil rights and legal power than men do. As I’ve stated before and cannot emphasize enough: your safety is literally at the mercy of the woman you’re with. In The Man’s No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet Earth, I exhort men to reject relationship-zapping double standards. In “Why Men Avoid Commitment,” I expose America’s odious anti-male media, legislative, judicial, and law-enforcement complex. To complete the puzzle, I shed more light, in this article, on the civil-rights perils haunting all American men—who must understand and actively work to eradicate these perils. Profiling Your Woman As you date or contemplate marriage to your woman, or if you are currently espoused but your marital bliss is beyond souring, you must be able to answer the following question: How can you avoid Steven’s fate? Only by knowing in advance that your woman is a likely 911 abuser and that you could be her target. Then, run like hell in the opposite direction—before it’s too late! Now, what specific signs indicate that your woman may be a “Jessica”? The answer lies in profiling—the faux bane of the PC crowd. A 911 abuser fits a clear profile: no spine, no self-esteem, no self-respect, no courage, and no sense that women have natural power equal to that of men. Sadly, a 911 abuser was raised to loathe and fear men and to believe that, without the police and the courts—her personal army—she has no power. Beware this kind of woman. The following table, “Top-10 Signs She’ll Abuse 911 to Punish You,” helps you profile a likely 911 abuser. Ring any bells? The more of these signs she exhibits, the more you should worry. Worse: VAWA encourages and condones her 911 fraud! Solution: leave her. If you can’t leave now, for various reasons, consult a lawyer to begin protecting yourself. Don’t tempt fate: a vindictive woman is a serious risk to your civil rights, and the law is NOT on your side.
Marc H. Rudov Marc H. Rudov is an investment banker and business consultant residing in Silicon Valley, California. He is the author of the book The Man’s No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet Earth TM (ISBN 0974501719) and ten other articles:
Rudov’s book, articles, and dating service are available at www.NoNonsenseDating.com
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|