Desperate Fathers Result from Male Persecution

June 20, 2004

No one helps or defends men when they are in need. But everyone helps and defends women, even when they are undeserving, and at men's expense. The same prejudice places men in social positions that subject normal men to adverse conditions. Thus, a normal person will react in an abnormal way if placed in an abnormal environment, which is normal. Severely persecuted men become more likely to abandon their children, not pay child support, commit suicide or murder-suicide, or other crazy or violent acts. But these reactions are taken out of this context and used to further degrade men's status in society by using these examples to demonstrate male violence. Many people don't realize that men who are victims of persecution, with many suffering from depression and possibly considering suicide, are normal men subjected to the adversities of the system and prejudices of modern society. Let's consider just one social aspect of this prevalent condition within today’s society - divorce and child custody issues.

But first let’s look at the big picture – equal reproductive rights. A major point to consider is: Why are fathers predominantly the ones who pay child support? Besides the courts predominately ruling in the mother’s favor, men’s lack of equal reproductive rights to women is a condition that starts before the child is born. A potential father’s equal reproductive rights to the potential mother to not have the child, although not officially recognized, are often violated. Women often dictate whether the child is born against the potential father’s will, in which case he should not be held liable for child support. No woman is forced to pay child support for a child she didn’t want. She can abort the fetus or give the child up for adoption without the father’s consent. Many women also dictate against the father’s will that the child be adopted or that the fetus be terminated. Many cases, most getting little national attention, as would not be the case concerning women, involve men spending thousands to either have their children kidnapped by state-supported adoption agencies, or aborted against the father’s will. Let’s look at the process that occurs by divorce and child custody issues when fathers try to gain custody of their children.

Fathers are individually attacked by a state supported arsenal of sex-biased social workers, with the ‘ex closely coached by man-hating agency workers available to help women, but not men. For example, many fathers, having no prior police record, are subjected to a variety of feminist-sculptured allegations set in place, ranging from physical and mental abuse to child molestation, with protective orders granted without question that immediately remove the father from his home and family that involve criminal charges, and convicted (or plea bargained with as a persuasive tool/leverage to get custody) due to the system in divorce and child custody cases. Amazingly, the false accusers are not held accountable, even when these fathers are found innocent. Many innocent fathers are found guilty. As men are subjected to continual persecution and contempt by a very sex-prejudiced society, fatherhood is no exception and no less threatened than any other aspect of male existence. By his child serving as bait in a trap, one violation is built upon another in his attempt to have any parental rights. And here women’s rights cross over again, and take away children’s rights to have a father.

The court also sets fathers up to be subjected to violence by the new boyfriend/spouse. If a problem occurs, since the father (non-custodial parent) is required to transport (pick-up/deliver the child), he is placed at the mother's/boyfriend's residence, and held more accountable for any confrontation. Best interests of the child aren't taken into consideration, let alone any consideration for the best interests or even protection of fathers, despite the fact the court is responsible for placing fathers in harm’s way and subjecting them to more liability, in addition to the burden of complete transportation (pick-up and delivery)!

Financial incentives are based on the more time the child is kept from the father the more child support the mother receives. Many fathers are arbitrarily targeted and persecuted to complete ruin, both criminally and financially. Systematic tools to accomplish this task include: false claims and allegations that are used to take their children from their lives, and to deprive children of their fathers; as well as excessive child support and alimony garnishments, all to "justify" child support/family services acting as mad attack dogs to destroy men's lives, committing extortion by garnishing their wages without due process, and attaching fraudulent lien/claims upon their credit - also a federal offense! What is also illegitimately "justified" taxation without representation and excessive is that child support is often taxed on what a person should be able to make instead of actual income! This isn't America.

I got a good taste of this injustice in my own custody case, up to which point I'd only heard of happening to others who I thought were leaving something out--perhaps failing to appear in court--because I believed this is America where nothing like this could ever happen. Others, I'm sure are under the same impression, which misconception helps to suppress any opposition, let alone expose this tyranny and government criminal action. But I found out different when, without a hearing, I had money extorted from me by the state, during which time period I was deemed in compliance by the same district court and paying my monthly child support payments in addition to this extortion of my funds.

My custody case was handled by a judge in the same district court that ruled to garnish my wages against the judge's order who ruled me in compliance. I was never behind, and paid directly. The Office of Recovery Services had to then be ordered by this judge of the same court to stop garnishing my wages, and later ordered to take a fraudulent lien off my credit that was applied due to mere vindictiveness by this agency, punishable by a $1,000.00 per month fine, except to which criminal liability the state is immune–deemed above the law--by the state court system. In an apparent attempt to impose my guilt, this same state agency even wrote a letter to my daughter’s mother, telling her not to accept my child support payments!

This is tyranny–something we're supposed to be protected against by constitutional law, and something this country was formed to prevent, and has never before experienced. A government that was formed in opposition to such violation of the people is now a violator of the people. This is happening in other states as well.

Even after I contacted the federal authorities concerning this issue, I was not helped. The FBI and U.S. Justice Dept. refused to help me in the face of a blatant U.S. Constitutional violation! Many others have had the same experience, who have been rendered helpless against a tyrant operating above the law, with federal agencies employed to protect our freedom, as in my case, refusing to do anything about it! They wouldn't even assign the incident a case number. I was told it wasn't a big enough priority. Since when is the violation of one's constitutional rights, with the ability to destroy one’s life, not a big enough priority? And when does a crime need priority to warrant a case number and documentation? This is the same as the local police telling a person who's been robbed that it isn't a big enough priority and not bothering to investigate or assign the incident a case number. They apparently don't want to acknowledge or have any records that would legally bind them to their duty, and hold them accountable.

The violation of our American U.S. Constitution isn't a big enough priority? Is this not treason? This is turning against the premise upon what makes us America. A U.S. Constitutional violation against one is a violation against all Americans. I was shuffled around by some, told that I would be helped by a couple, maybe by others, and then no, that I would have to pursue justice through private organizations by attaining my own attorney in the matter who had already told me the state is immune - above the law - which is why I contacted the feds. in the first place! What good is a government, using our taxes, if it no longer serves the people it is bound to serve and protect?

This story represents only one aspect of the plight of men and good, conscientious fathers in today’s society. The implementation of Femi-Nazi philosophy is now taking place in persecution of men in no less of a systematic way than Jews were first treated in Nazi Germany. But let’s remember, we’re in it together. Any violation of our country’s constitution is a violation of all Americans. And those who violate it are guilty of treason.

Allan Millard