New Adoption Law Correctly Requires Mothers to Publish Sexual Pasts, Says Fatherhood Educational Institute


August 14, 2002


by Jeffery M. Leving

CHICAGO, Aug. 13-- The following is a statement on a new Florida adoption law by Jeffery M. Leving, president emeritus, Fatherhood Educational Institute:

A new Florida adoption law now requires a mother to make an exhaustive effort to notify the biological father so he has the opportunity to stop the adoption.  In cases where the birth father cannot readily be identified or located after the required search, the mother must place a legal notice in a local newspaper that includes her name, her description, the names or the description of the possible father(s), and the date and city or county of conception.

I commend the Florida legislature and Gov. Bush for their courageous acknowledgment of the problem birth fathers nationwide face in preventing adoptions that they don't want or, in too many cases, don't even know are happening. This progressive law puts teeth into the notification requirements and attempts to uphold both birth parents' fundamental constitutional rights to parent their own biological children.

Who could argue with that?  Many recently did so after the press released the story.  I was struck, but not surprised, by the extreme animosity expressed toward fathers by people interviewed in various media.  The misguided thinking goes:  Surely these dads don't know about the pregnancy or that they have a child because they must be willfully "absent" or runaway dads. Why didn't the father stay in touch with the mother so he would know she was pregnant?  This thinking ignores the fact that some mothers conceal the pregnancy or can simply disappear and prevent dad from staying in touch.

Sadly, a father objecting to adoption proceedings or coming forward after his child was adopted without his knowledge or consent is often seen as a troublemaker rather than an aggrieved dad trying to protect his child.

An argument that is seldom put forth is that fathers want notification to contest an adoption because they want to be responsible and have meaningful and loving relationships with their children. Why is it so hard to believe that a man would want to love, nurture, and protect his own offspring?

We as a society are talking out of both sides of our mouths when we say we want fathers to be "responsible" and involved, yet when they come forward, their motives for doing so are denigrated or questioned. The truth is that most men love their children and want to be there for them as much as most mothers do.

To me, this is an example of societies' conflicted and stereotypical thinking regarding dads and men. Unfortunately, male and father bashing has become so automatic that many people don't even realize that they are doing it. It's time to raise the collective consciousness. It is incredibly callous to ignore men's desire to parent their own biological children and to accuse them of some sinister motive for wanting to have notification when their offspring is about to be adopted.

Many forget what the Florida legislature was trying to correct by this legislation, and now the entire adoption statute might be challenged in the near future. This progressive legislation is attempting to prevent heart-wrenching "Baby Richard" or "Baby Jessica" situations in which fit biological fathers, who had not consented to adoption, came back after the birth of their children and gained custody of them from adoptive parents.

In my experience, there are far too many similar cases where the pregnancy or the child's existence is concealed from the biological father. In one high-profile case, the dad was told his baby was stillborn even though the child was alive and well.  Far too often a fit father loses his child to an adoptive family forever, anyway. These tragic cases usually happen quietly behind the scenes.

Consider the following cases:

-- In New York a 20-year-old father lost his son to an adoption against his will after his ex-girlfriend and her mother concealed the baby boy's existence. This dad only found out about his son after the ex-girlfriend's mother relented and told him that the child had been adopted.

-- In West Virginia a mother and her attorney put up the child for adoption without the father's consent. This father won his $7.8 million suit against the adoption attorney, the mother, her parents, and others. He won the lawsuit, but he suffered the loss of his child to an adoption against his will.

-- In Pennsylvania, a young father, who did everything correctly to prove his desire to care for his offspring, "Baby M," fought for 4 years to prevent an adoption of his baby daughter who had been placed, against his wishes, with a prospective adoptive couple. The adoption agency that placed the baby had failed to get his consent to the adoption. He lost precious time with his daughter. The prospective adoptive couple negotiated an arrangement with the birth father and the child's mother to try to resolve the sad situation.

The legal process for the dad to contest an adoption mandates that he receive notice.

Without such notice, the children in these cases can lose a biological father, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and an entire extended family. We need to make sure the father really wants to relinquish his child to an adoption to begin with to prevent all this trauma to the child and everyone else involved. But, it first requires "notice."

I predicted that there would be adoption attorneys who would oppose this law, and this has happened. I think a part of the real impetus for this opposition could be the adoption agencies' fear of losing available children for adoption.

We can't just cut short the adoption process and due process rights for biological fathers simply because it's more convenient. We're talking about protecting basic constitutional rights:  the freedom to parent one's own children and the fundamental right of these children to know and love their parent.

I encourage the Florida legislature to stand strong on their progressive law and not cave in to archaic thinking that may seek to abolish it. Other states should follow the lead of Florida and address the issue and enact laws that provide equal justice for mothers and fathers. As a society we must recognize and act upon the fact that dads love their children as much as mothers do.


Jeffrey M. Leving


Chicago-based attorney Jeffery M. Leving is co-author of the Illinois Joint Custody Law and President Emeritus of the nonprofit Fatherhood Educational Institute (FEI). Leving is author of the book, Fathers' Rights. His efforts helped to reunite Elian Gonzalez with his father. He currently serves on the Congressional Task Force on Fathers, Families, & Public Policy. Jeffrey Leving can be heard every live Thursday night on MND Radio. Visit his website here.
Site Meter