War and Politics
Staple down the tablecloths!
January 6, 2004
Silly members of the Leftist news-media elite persist in using the word “if” while discussing Hillary Clinton’s role in next year’s presidential elections. There is no “if”!! Hillary wants to become the next President of the United States. Look out!
There, I’ve made my point. (But, please keep reading anyway.)
Thanks to that same news-media elite gang — “the vast left-wing conspiracy”, to twist a phrase from my enemy’s playbook — most of you now reading this column have probably never heard of a little event in Binghamton, New York, in early May of 1999. The event to which I refer was the very first anti-Hillary rally in NY State. It was only days after she launched her infamous “listening tour”. You know, the one in which she had to carry out her “duties” as First Lady. Oddly, although First Lady is a national position (not office), her tour was conducted almost exclusively in New York State. As I see it, the only real “duty” of the First Lady is conducted somewhere on the second floor of the White House; and, only with her husband. In contrast, Hillary Clinton felt that her “duty” was to be whisked around New York on a tax-funded airplane to meet lots of strangers. Somebody had to stand up and say no, and a rally seemed like the place to do it. I was there, because I organized it. To borrow another phrase — from the famous robot on the Lost in Space television series — “Warning, warning! Danger, danger!”
Democrats are finally coming to their senses, led by Zell Miller of Georgia. He has come out and admitted what Bubba Doublewide has secretly known for years: the Democratic Party has been taken over by Communists. Yes, I said Communists. (And, thanks to Bubba, it was the Southern Democrats that helped put Ronald Reagan in the White House in order to stop the Communists. And, he did. Well, overseas, anyway.) Some people have tried to “politely” describe the Clintonistas and their ilk as “Left-wingers” or “Socialists”. For those people, I would “politely” point to what Vladimir Lenin said to the news media of his day, shortly after the Bolsheviks secured power: “A socialist is a communist.” There you have it, straight from the horse’s ... uh ... mouth. And, by any accepted definition, the core leadership of the Democratic Party has clearly demonstrated — in word and deed — that they support the Communist agenda.
Modern society is full of “isms”, but there are three that have more in common that most people think. They are: communism, globalism, and Islamism. Their common thread is another “ism”: totalitarianism. And, the people that adhere to these “isms” want to help usher in tyranny on a global scale. There are two main ways to stop tyranny: politics (a war of words) and combat (a real war). So, whom are we fighting?
Hillary Clinton is a Communist, and so are some of her close allies. I know more about one in particular, because I’ve done some focused research. That person is Maurice Hinchey, who was elected to Congress in 1992, after serving for 18 years in the NY State Assembly. I ran against Hinchey in 1994 as a third-party candidate. (Factoid: I was the first person in the history of the United States to run for Congress while working full-time at McDonalds. How that happened is a topic for another time. Many people told me at the time that I was living The American Dream.) Although I lost the election, my average cost-per-vote was only 65 cents! That is one of the most efficient campaigns in modern political history. My strategy was simple: tell the truth. You see where it got me. That is because Communists gain power by very skillful lying, and many voters choose to believe the lie that offers them the greatest “benefit”.
Hillary and Hinchey are behind many of the Communist schemes that gurgle through the legislative process — below the radar of most observers. Hinchey is a member of the Progressive Caucus, along with open homosexual Bernie Sanders, who hosts this membership roster. (Is hosting a page for a Communist organization part of the Web-hosting privileges of a Congressman?) Their name implies — on the surface — that they are in favor of progress. Their idea of progress, however, is that of advancing the Bolshevik Revolution until it smothers what is left of the real America. It may surprise some of you that more than 10 percent of the members of Congress support the Communist ideology.
The above might sound like strong language to some; but, it is only an honest representation of the facts. Strong language is needed in order to overcome the adept use of “smoke and mirrors” by the Communists in our government. But, don’t take my word for the connection. Please note Congressman Hinchey’s own words, praising the Progressive Caucus and their legislative plan. His words are found in this release from the Communist Party of the USA. Hinchey’s quote, like those of other “PC” members (I’m sure the initials are no accident), is laden with buzz-phrases that must be closely scrutinized to extract the true meaning. I’ve been to enough of Hinchey’s public events, and debated him on television, to be able to translate from the Commie-speak. And, I’ve listened to enough of Hillary’s public remarks to know that she uses that same dialect.
Here are some examples of Commie-speak.
· “We need to reduce local property taxes.” meaning: We want to take over control of all schools by placing them under the US Department of Education. Then, although your Federal taxes will rise astronomically, your local property taxes will go down somewhat. Trust us; we know what’s best for you. Besides, it’s the economy, stupid! (Isn’t it interesting that the most educated citizens in the history of mankind are regarded as being too stupid to decide what’s best for our children?)
· “We need a fair system of taxation.” meaning: We want to buy votes from poor people by promising them a free ride on the backs of rich people. (And, we control the definition of “rich”.) By giving them a free ride, we can insure that they will not have any incentive to become rich themselves. If they did, then they might discover how unfair the current (read: Communist) tax system really is. The only fair tax is a flat tax. There is a good reason why Thomas Jefferson said, “The power to tax is the power to destroy.” Whenever there is a so-called “progressive” (buzz-word for “Communist”) tax, there is no telling what will be taxed next.
· “I’m not campaigning for office.” meaning: My legal advisors have assured me that, technically, I’m not breaking any campaign laws by going around acting like a candidate, trying to get up enough money to actually become a candidate. It worked for Hillary by “listening” in New York, just as it worked for Jesse Jackson by “helping” in Lebanon in 1983; except, of course, that Hillary’s non-campaign actually got her elected. And, just to make sure that Joe Sixpack can’t do anything about it, we’ll call him a “lobbyist”, and handcuff him with “campaign reform”.
· “I support the military.” meaning: Note that this phrase does not specify our military. It is used by Communists that support putting the military of the United States under the command of the United Nations. It is the grammatical parallel of saying, “I did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky, (looking into the camera, and speaking to Monica about another woman in the room)” versus, “I did not have sex with that woman: Miss Lewinsky.” Like most Leftist ideas, “the devil is in the details”.
· “After all, it’s for the children.” meaning: This is one of the most effective, and heinous, of the Commie-speak buzz-phrases. What it really means is, “Ha! We have you over a barrel, you complacent saps! You don’t even know what we’re trying to sneak through, much less how to stop it. But, even if you get up the gumption to try, we will make you look like monsters in the public arena, because you will be perceived as doing something bad to children.” Here’s an example. If you support gun ownership in order to protect your family, we’ll make you look as though you support the wackos that shot up Columbine High School. After all, disarming the public (so they can’t resist tyranny”) is “for the children”. Of course, you have to use their definition of “children”. Remember “Mister Ponytail” at the 1992 presidential debates? He pleaded for Bill Clinton to, “Just treat us as your children.” And, he did. God help us.
We have all heard and read these buzz-phrases many times; but, have we truly listened? Apparently not, or the Clintons would have been given “new employment horizons” back in 1996. Those same buzz-phrases have been used by Leftist candidates at nearly every level of government, all across America, for many years. The phrases sound innocent, but the meaning behind them is grossly malevolent.
In an effort to look as innocent as they sound, Leftist candidates have a penchant for using the public schools as a backdrop for their campaign TV ads. I believe that, if private citizens would do their research (as I did when living in NY State), they would find that most states prohibit the use of school facilities for partisan political purposes. But, the Communists that control the Democratic Party have such a stranglehold on our school systems that they do it with impunity, and with regularity. As a private citizen, in 1998, I filed a pro se lawsuit against Congressman Hinchey to stop him from airing the ads. One of the co-defendants was Judith Hope, a close friend of Hillary’s from Little Rock, who moved to New York to take over the state’s Democratic Party a few years in advance of Hillary’s “spontaneous” campaign for the US Senate. What a coincidence.
Please pardon the length of that foundational digression, but it was necessary in order to demonstrate that “Commie-speak” exists for specific reasons. Those reasons are designed to obfuscate the true motives of the candidates and their organizations. Without such smokescreens, the Communists among us know that the average American would stand up and put a stop to their activities. But, by skillfully weaving their lies, the Communists among us have gained significant power. And, now that the ideological Communists have gone “mainstream”, they are in a position to help the people that helped to put them there. One of the key groups that helped the Communists hijack America is the organized homosexual lobby. If you don’t believe that there is a connection between homosexuals and communism, then you probably don’t know about the Mattachine Society. They were hard-core Communists that happened to also be homosexual activists. They did much of their work as secretly as possible. And, they banded together to fight for all of their Leftist, anti-God causes. That is why homosexuals support pro-abortion causes, even though homosexuals (by definition) do not create babies. And, that is why there was a pro-lesbian rally in DC on Inauguration Day in 1993 to properly recognize and thank Communists such as Hillary Clinton. (Audio tapes of the rally were aired on The Rush Limbaugh Show. One speaker shouted into the microphone, “Finally, we have a First Lady that we can f---!)
This article barely scratches the surface of showing just how dangerous Hillary would be if she ever resumes her occupation of (not merely “occupancy in”) the White House. Remember that, as they exited from power, the Clintonista Gang literally stole many items from the White House and its environs. The category of stolen property that stands out in everyone’s memory is the silverware. Well, if you ever see Hillary Clinton occupying the White House again, my suggestion is that you staple down the tablecloths.
