May 2, 2005
by
Richard L. Davis
Being ignorant is not so much a shame as being unwilling to learn.
- Benjamin Franklin
How or why have our public policy makers allowed domestic violence intervention to become gender specific? If the Violence Against Women Act is gender neutral, as Senator Biden claims it is, why is it called the Violence Against Women Act?
The office for Victims of Crime (OVC) invites applicants to apply for a $350,000.00 grant to develop a series of videotapes concerning the issue of domestic violence and/or assault against older women. Why has OVC chosen to ignore older male victims?
OVC announces that the purpose of the grant is to highlight an overall community response to one or both of these crimes against elder women. Why not present an overall community response to one or both of these crimes against both elder women and men? Is it really necessary to ignore male victimization?
The National Center on Elder Abuse estimates that approximately one of every three elder victims is male. A National Institute of Justice report documents that approximately one of every three abusers is female.
The National Elder Abuse Incidence Study Final Report of September 1998 documents the following victimization. Males only comprise 42.4% of the elder population over 60 and hence female victimization will be over represented.
Neglect Emotional Physical Financial Abandonment
Male 40.0% 23.7% 28.6% 37.0% 62.2%
Female 60.0% 76.3% 71.4% 63% 37.8%
The OVC intends to present the elder female victimization videos to victim advocates, service providers, health care providers, faith community leaders, law enforcement officers, prosecutors and judges. All of these professionals will receive no information about elder male victimization. Out of sight, out of mind perhaps?
Can it really be true that the office for Victims of Crime simply do not care about male victimization? How is it that our public policy makers have decided that male victimization, regardless of age, just does not matter?