Democrats: The PC Anti-White Party
January 16, 2004
by Bernard Chapin
Last
week a long lost friend emailed me after coming across several of
my internet columns. He said, “It sounds like you’ve become
a Republican” and then nothing else. It took me a while to realize
that he meant it as an insult because, in many parts of the country,
the word “Republican” is a pejorative by itself.
I told him that not just I, but he, and every white person in the country should join the Grand Old Party, or, at the very least, resign their Democratic Party membership as soon as they can.
I often overlook the fact that I am descended from liberals. My parents and just about everyone I knew growing up voted Democrat. The same was true about the people I associated with in college. My father was a good man and an old school liberal but he made the mistake of thinking government spending correlates with helping people. He was wrong, but I am confident that if he were alive today and could hear the way in which the Democrats pander exclusively to their militant left wing, he would melt his party card.
Just to participate in the ranks of the donkeyites, you have to automatically embrace multiculturalism and diversity as your secondary religions. Many liberals have made the pursuit of diversity a replacement for religion as religion mandates judging yourself and others. To them judgment is as outdated a concept as property owners alone voting.
I can not bear to be around this crowd and they cannot bear to be around me as the “all cultures are valuable except the west” outlook runs contrary to the realities of the life on this planet. I have hated political correctness from the first moment it corrected me, but it took several years to realize that this anti-American, anti-male, anti-Caucasian plague originates from the left. I finally recognized that liberalism and PC are forever intertwined. I will have nothing to do with them and neither should you.
Luckily, others are slowly recognizing this as well. Voting trends illustrate that white men are beginning to see that the Democratic Party exists only to marginalize them: “In 2000, however, Al Gore lost too much white support to sustain this delicate coalition. George W. Bush beat him by 12 points among whites generally and by 24 points among white men.” [Jason Riley, Opinionjournal.com, January 13, 2004]
That’s great news and I hope that the divide in white voters becomes even greater in 2004. Hopefully, there’ll be more scenes like at the 2000 Democratic Party convention, when a female Senator stood up and received a huge ovation for bemoaning the low overall number of female senators. Why would they equate gender with how one performed as a senator? They do this because, on the left, it is widely assumed that women are a fount of goodness in the world and men are a source of evil.
Yes friends, stupid and repugnant ideas never die, they just fade away into the Democratic Party platform.
These minority worshipping aristocrats care more about chromosomes and skin color than they do in representing the American people on the whole. The other day, Wesley Clark stated that, if elected, he would provide yet more goodies for Native Americans. Who would this come at the expense of? Everybody else.
Howard Dean, in the last debate, stated that altering the flawed racial consciousness of white Americans was the way in which to improve race relations. Ah, it’s all our fault. Personally, I think getting whites to stop obsessing and deferring over the subject of race is the way to improve racial relations. Start acting you’ll like not morally inferior and soon we’ll no longer be expected to apologize for things we’ve never done.
The real source of racism is people like Dean. He’s willing to evaluate the worth of citizens based on external characteristics alone. We should be grateful that Al Sharpton was there the other night to illustrate to the frontrunner that those who sleep with dogs really do get fleas.
Apparently, Dean is not enough of a racial apologist for some of the other candidates. Sharpton argued, “It seems as though you discovered blacks and browns during this campaign.” Meaning, that he didn’t spend enough time obsessing about whether his cabinet, in a state with a black population of less than one, had enough diversity in it.
Aren’t these fireworks merely an attempt to cover up the fact that this party has no new ideas with which to impress the electorate?
While it’s nice to see Sharpton attack Dean, he could not be more wrong about their soon-to-be leader. Memorizing racial hierarchies is a prerequisite to obtaining a Democratic Party identification card. He could never have got as far as he has if he didn’t.
When General Clark obtained his official membership papers last year, I’m sure he had to repeat five times “I am a privileged white patriarch” while clicking the heels of his red shoes before they’d let him take part in the primaries.
The irony about the Democratic minority fetish is that none of their policies actually benefit minorities. The only groups who profit (and I mean profit in the economic sense) are the teacher’s unions, trial lawyers and government employees.
The liberals don’t even bolster those unions who tirelessly campaign for them in Iowa and everywhere else polls exist. What Democratic initiatives help America’s blue-collar workers? Increasing taxes? Putting social security in a “lockbox” and thereby not fixing the problem? When they advocate for the unmitigated flow of immigrants through our borders it only harms indigenous workers. Unfettered immigration cannot help them, but none of this prevents forty percent of the population from voting ‘D’ when it’s election time.
It’s even sadder that so many black Americans in particular pledge their eternal support to this party of race hustlers and shysters. While it’s true that Howard Dean might get 90 percent of their vote, a Dean presidency would only hurt this predominantly middle class subgroup of Americans.
Blacks are making it in this country and should be proud of the way they have prospered, but Democratic politicians deny their success the same way Marxist professors deny that the Soviet Union was an example of their theories being put into practice. I think it was Jay Nordlinger who once said that for liberals it’s always the Jim Crow era and the location’s always Selma, Alabama.
To the Democrats, some Americans will forever be more equal than
others. People like me, under their reign, are destined for the back
of the civil rights and employment bus. My advice to all Caucasians
is that only if you’re a masochist should you consider voting
for this race-monger chain gang. It’s time that everyone gets
off the plantation. Let’s hope these racists get pummeled in
2004.
DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE FORUM!
Bernard Chapin is a writer in Chicago.
